Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of method features

From: Critical assessment of variant prioritization methods for rare disease diagnosis within the rare genomes project

Model #

Team

Variant call quality

Variant allele frequency

Variant deleteriousness prediction

Familial segregation

Relevance to phenotype

Limited to human disease-associated genes

Limited to coding regions

Submitted compound heterozygous variants

1

Team 9 (Invitae Moon)

Yes

Yes—≤ 2% gnomAD, plus more common P/LP variants

Yes—trained on ClinVar and in-house classifications

Yes—plus incomplete penetrance

Yes

Yes—Apollo database

Yes—plus known P/LP non-coding variants

Yes

1

Team 12 (Lichtarge)

Yes

Yes

Yes—Evolutionary Action

Yes

Yes

Yes—HPO, DisGeNet, ClinVar, HumSavar, literature

Yes—frameshift, nonsense, and missense only (excluded causal variant in P19)

Yes

2–3

Team 12 (Lichtarge)

Yes

Yes

Yes—Evolutionary Action

Yes

Yes

Yes—VarElect NGS Phenotyper

Yes—frameshift, nonsense, and missense only (excluded causal variant in P19)

Yes

1–4

Team 11 (enGenome)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes—MedGen, Disease Ontology, Orphanet (excluded causal variants in P6 and P23)

No

Yes

1–3

Team 14 (TCS)

Yes

Yes

Yes (excluded causal variant in P16)

Yes (variant in P5 was predicted as compound heterozygous with another variant)

Yes

Yes—ClinVar, HPO, STRING, PubMed (excluded causal variant in P6)

Yes

Yes

1

Team 5 (Exomiser)

Yes

Yes—< 0.1% dominant, < 2% cmphet recessive 1000 Genomes, ExAC, gnomAD

Yes—REVEL, MVP (excluded causal variant in P24)

Yes—did not allow for sex-limited expression (excluded causal variant in P27)

Yes

No—also included model organisms and interacting proteins

Yes—plus known P/LP non-coding variants

Yes

2

Team 5 (Exomiser)

Yes

Yes—< 0.1% dominant, < 2% cmphet recessive 1000 Genomes, ExAC, gnomAD

Yes—REVEL, MVP (excluded causal variant in P24)

Yes—did not allow for sex-limited expression (excluded causal variant in P27)

Yes

Yes—OMIM, Orphanet (excluded causal variants in P6 and P23)

Yes—plus known P/LP non-coding variants

Yes

3

Team 5 (Exomiser)

No

Yes—< 0.1% dominant, < 2% cmphet recessive 1000 Genomes, ExAC, gnomAD

Yes—REVEL, MVP (excluded causal variant in P24)

Yes—did not allow for sex-limited expression (excluded causal variant in P27)

Yes

Yes—OMIM, Orphanet (excluded causal variants in P6 and P23)

Yes—plus known P/LP non-coding variants

Yes

4

Team 5 (Exomiser)

Yes

Yes—< 0.1% dominant, < 2% cmphet recessive 1000 Genomes, ExAC, gnomAD

Yes—REVEL, MVP (excluded causal variant in P24)

Yes—plus incomplete penetrance

Yes

Yes—OMIM, Orphanet (excluded causal variants in P6 and P23)

Yes—plus known P/LP non-coding variants

Yes

5

Team 5 (Exomiser)

No

Yes—< 0.1% dominant, < 2% cmphet recessive 1000 Genomes, ExAC, gnomAD

Yes—REVEL, MVP (excluded causal variant in P24)

Yes—did not allow for sex-limited expression (excluded causal variant in P27)

Yes

Yes—OMIM, Orphanet (excluded causal variants in P6 and P23)

No

Yes

1–6

Team 4 (DITTO)

Yes

No

Yes—trained on ClinVar and HGMD classifications

No

Yes—Exomiser

No

No

No (excluded causal variant in P5)

1–6

Team 2 (AIBI)

No

Yes—< 5%

Yes—REVEL

Yes

Yes—Phenolyzer

Yes—HPO

Yes

Yes

1

Team 13

Yes

Yes—< 0.1%

Yes—MutPred2 (excluded causal variant in P27)

Yes—absent in parent if data avaliable (excluded causal variants in P5 and P27)

Yes—HPO including interacting proteins

No

Yes—missense only (excluded causal variants in P5, P7, P16, P19, and P22)

No (excluded causal variant in P5)

2

Team 13

Yes

Yes—< 0.1%

Yes—REVEL (excluded causal variant in P27)

Yes—absent in parent if data available (excluded causal variants in P5 and P27)

Yes—HPO including interacting proteins

No

Yes—missense only (excluded causal variants in P5, P7, P16, P19, and P22)

No (excluded causal variant in P5)

1–4

Team 8 (BORG)

Yes

Yes—≤ 1% 1000 Genomes, ExAC, gnomAD

Yes—CADD

Yes

Yes—HPO

-

-

No (excluded causal variant in P5)

1

Team 7 (Uniss)

–

Yes—≤ 1% gnomAD

Yes

-

Yes—HPO, Orphanet

Yes

-

No (excluded causal variant in P5)

1

Team 3 (Bologna Biocomputing Group)

–

Yes—≤ 1% gnomAD

-

Yes

Yes—eDGAR, PhenPath (excluded causal variants in P4, P7, and P21)

Yes—eDGAR, PhenPath

Yes—frameshift, nonsense, and missense only (excluded causal variant in P19)

No (excluded causal variant in P5)

2

Team 3 (Bologna Biocomputing Group)

–

Yes—≤ 1% gnomAD

-

Yes—de novo and homozygous only (excluded causal variants in P2, P5, P6, P11, P22, and P27)

Yes—eDGAR, PhenPath (excluded causal variants in P4, P7, and P21)

No

Yes—frameshift, nonsense, and missense only (excluded causal variant in P19)

No (excluded causal variant in P5)

  1. The 11 teams providing methods details are displayed with key method features and, where possible to determine, the explanation for excluded causal variants